Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Silence of the Bees


Silence of the Bees
Introduction

In the winter of 2006, a strange phenomenon fell upon honeybee hives across the country. Without a trace, millions of bees vanished from their hives. A precious pollinator of fruits and vegetables, the disappearing bees left billions of dollars of crops at risk and threatened our food supply. The epidemic set researchers scrambling to discover why honeybees were dying in record numbers — and to stop the epidemic in its tracks before it spread further.
Silence of the Bees is the first in-depth look at the search to uncover what is killing the honeybee. The filmmakers of Bees take viewers around the world to the sites of fallen hives, to high-tech labs, where scientists race to uncover clues, and even deep inside honeybee colonies. Silence of the Bees is the story of a riveting, ongoing investigation to save honeybees from dying out. The film goes beyond the unsolved mystery to tell the story of the honeybee itself, its invaluable impact on our diets and takes a look at what’s at stake if honeybees disappear. Silence of the Bees explores the complex world of the honeybee in crisis and instills in viewers a sense of urgency to learn ways to help these extraordinary animals.


Watch Silence of the Bees on PBS. See more from Nature.


http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episodes/silence-of-the-bees/full-episode/251/

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Bee Deviled: Scientists No Longer Bumbling Over Cause Of Colony Collapse Disorder

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/annie-spiegelman/bee-deviledscientists_b_1884294.html


Though worldwide bee health has been on the decline since the 1990s, it wasn't until the fall of 2006 that beekeepers nationwide began noticing millions of bees vanishing from their hives. This syndrome, named colony collapse disorder, or CCD, is characterized by the disappearance of adult honey bees from the hive, leaving the newborns to fend for themselves.
If you're not a huge fan of the bee, why should this matter to you? Well, if you like to eat food, you should be concerned. Besides gathering nectar to produce honey, bees pollinate agricultural crops, home gardens, orchards and wildlife habitat. As they travel from blossom to blossom in search of nectar, pollen sticks to their furry body and is transferred to another flowering blossom enabling it to swell into a ripened fruit. It's estimated that about one-third of the human diet is derived from insect-pollinated plants and three-quarters of all plants on the planet depend on insects or animals for pollination.
Most scientists now agree that the main causes of colony collapse disorder are nutritional stress, pathogens (mites, viruses and fungus), and pesticides. Two recent studies published in Science strengthen the case that a relatively new class of systemic insecticides entitled 'neonicotinoid pesticides' are indeed key drivers behind recent pollinator decline.
Not knowing how to even pronounce the word neonicotinoid,I decided to contact Pesticide Action Network, North America, (www.panna.org) where trained agronomists, chemists, ecologists and analysts track and translate science, making it publicly accessible to the rest of us. I spoke with Heather Pilactic, Panna's Co-Director, about the recent bee die-offs and what consumers can do to support the struggling beekeepers.
According to PANNA's reading of the latest science, these new studies show that pesticides do play a significant role in honeybee deaths. How large a role?
How big a role neonics, or any other bee-toxic pesticides play in CCD and pollinator decline really depends on the situation. The relative contribution of each of these three main causes will vary with location, timing, exposure levels, genetic vulnerability of a hive, etc.in ways that defy meaningful quantification. But the really short answer is "big."
What we do know is that pesticides are absolutely driving bee losses in a number of different ways: Increased herbicide use (driven by RoundUp Ready GE crops) is killing off habitat that bees rely on for nutrition. As for older pesticides, foliar (spray) applications of any number of pesticides while bees are foraging, is still common practice.
Bees are especially vulnerable to many insecticides: when you spray when and where they are eating, they die. New science out of the University of Pennsylvania's bee team shows that adjuvants, or "inert" ingredients that make up the bulk of a pesticide product formulation are impacting bee health as well.
A new class of fungicides -- once rarely used on corn -- have since 2006 been widely promoted as yield boosters. What little we have studied about the effects of fungicides on bees points to their synergistic effects when combined with neonics (as they often are): they increase the bee-toxicity of the latter up to 1,141-fold. The chemistry of yet another new class of fungicides indicates that they have insecticidal effects. Emerging science further points to fungicides as killing off important bee "gut" microbiota -- such as the bacteria that bees rely upon to turn pollen into bee bread, or the friendly bacteria that combat infection.
That's depressing enough but there's more. (Hang in there, pilgrim.) What's all the talk we hear about neonicotinoid pesticides?
Neonicotinoids, covers at least 142 million acres of U.S. countryside, much of it corn -- on which bees rely heavily for protein. As systemics, these insecticides course through plants' vascular systems to be expressed in pollen, nectar and guttation droplets. This class also happens to be very long-lasting, so they are accumulating in the soil, and saturating the environment in ways we have yet to quantify.
The most widely used of these neonicotinoids (imidacloprid, clothianidin, thiamethoxam) are known to be highly acutely toxic to bees, and have a variety of sub-lethal effects ranging from disorientation to memory, immunity and reproductive impairment. These pesticides are clearly making bees sick, and dead -- but so do a lot of other pesticides. What makes these neonicotinoids suspect is that they are known to be highly toxic to bees, pervasive, long-lasting and relatively new. Perhaps coincidentally, the emergence of CCD in the U.S. roughly coincides with the 5-fold increase of the level of neonics used on corn seed: seed companies began marketing seeds treated with a 5X level of neonicotinoids (1.25 mg/seed vs. .25) in 2004.
The peril of the bees is sounding an alarm warning us of environmental degradation but we're be too busy texting, facebooking and watching reality TV to notice. What are they trying to tell us with all that buzzing and disappearing?
Bees are an indicator species. They signal the well being of our broader environment, so their message is important. It is also one that I believe we are capable of receiving. Our generation, and our children's generation face overwhelming environmental issues. How do we process climate change? Water and food shortages? Biodiversity collapse? In a sense, the escape to virtual worlds is understandable. But I think of saving the bees as one of those graspable, manageable things that we can accomplish -- and that when we do accomplish it, the effects will ripple and magnify. If we stop poisoning bees, they will thrive and the world we live in will be more resilient as a result.

Why are you picking on Bayer's clothianidin? Doesn't Bayer make chewable baby aspirin?
Bayer's clothianidin -- which is one of the most toxic substances to bees that we know of -- remains on the market, in our view, illegally. There is no valid field study supporting its registration. The backstory is long and sordid, and we're still on the case. What it comes down to is that EPA has long been using this little-known loophole called "conditional registration" to speed pesticides to market with little or no safety data in hand. According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, of the 16,000 current product registrations: 11,000 (68 percent) have been conditionally registered -- that's 2/3 getting an essentially free pass to market.
So the Environmental Protection Agency tests for safety after the product has been on the market? That's reassuring... I need to go hide under my bed.
Registrants (such as Bayer) are then supposed to submit safety data according to defined criteria on a set deadline. What they do instead is delay, deliberately ignore certain criteria, or otherwise game the system to avoid real oversight. In the case of clothianidin, the field study they submitted was so poorly done as to be laughable -- it had no control and was on the wrong crop (canola instead of corn). EPA originally accepted it, then downgraded it and then neglected to close the loop.
Sounds like the pesticide industry has the EPA by the balls . . .What can the public do to help shift policy decisions that can help bees, beekeepers and people who like to eat safe food?
Our food system has always been a political arrangement in one form or another. What's heartening about the last 5 years or so is that the conversation is widening because folks are realizing that this is a political issue much more so than a lifestyle one. More people are seeing themselves as stakeholders in a rigged food system, and doing something about it. And that's a good thing! That's democracy.
So the MAN is still calling the shots? That's getting so old!
It is true that corporations and wealthy people have too much power in government -- but that won't change unless ordinary people engage the political process. Members of Congress truly are motivated by speaking with constituents who have a story to tell and know their issue. Decision makers still read the local papers, especially opinion pages. Get in the habit of writing letters to the editor, or OpEds. Or, get in the habit of making one phone call a week on one issue or another; before you know it, you'll be getting meetings with decision makers. Nobody can do everything, but we can all choose one thing and do it. For my money, I say, "get informed and get in the ring." Go to our website (www.panna.org) to get engaged, or pick another group working on this issue. What matters is commitment.
What is the "Imminent Hazard" legal claim filed by beekeepers and environmental groups?
"Imminent hazard" is policy-speak for "emergency so pressing that EPA has authority to take immediate action." Bees dying off en masse, year after year, is an emergency by any meaning of the term, and we petitioned EPA urging them to take action on this basis. Earlier this month they declined to do so, sticking to their original 2018 timeline for completing the analysis of neonic's impacts on bees (decisions and implementation would stretch out further still). 
Luckily, members of Congress are starting to pay attention. Senators Gilibrand, Leahy, Whitehouse, and most recently, Markey, have all sent letters to EPA essentially telling the Agency to hurry up.
Homework assignment:
Between now and September 25, 2012 we have an opportunity to respond to EPA's recent decision that "pollinator declines don't present an imminent hazard." We can't wait till 2018 to do more studies on how these toxins are poisoning bees and the rest of us suckers. That's plain lame. Bee die-offs are an emergency requiring immediate action-Sign the petition at: Action.panna.org/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=11359
Buzz Annie at www.dirtdiva.com

Thursday, October 04, 2012

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/05/08/what-biotech-company-blamed-for-bee-collapse-just-bought-leading-bee-research-firm.aspx
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-schiffman/the-fox-monsanto-buys-the_b_1470878.htmlhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-schiffman/the-fox-monsanto-buys-the_b_1470878.html

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

http://batcountryword.com/index.php/2012/06/11/bringing-it-all-together-our-exhaustive-research-into-honeybee-colony-collapse/

http://batcountryword.com/index.php/2012/06/11/bringing-it-all-together-our-exhaustive-research-into-honeybee-colony-collapse/


Bringing it all together: Our exhaustive research into honeybee colony collapse

Last summer was the first time I grew my own garden. It’s a bit strange that I’ve never grown a garden because my family have been farmers for decades if not centuries. I am actually the first generation who was not a farmer at some point in my life. Growing my own food has made me a bit more observant about “flowering insects” like the honeybee. I remember growing up stepping carefully though my yard in the 70s and 80s. Back then, if we didn’t have shoes on while walking through the grass, we were very likely to be stung by bees pollinating flowers –they were everywhere. This is also true of the less-famous pollinators, butterfly and other bee types. However, last year I didn’t see a single honeybee in my garden, not even on the rose bushes. It was as if they had all vanished. This got me wondering about how low the honeybee population has really sunk and just how screwed we are without them.

When talking about the extinction of honeybees, we are really talking about a total collapse of our food supply except for machine-pollinated veggies courtesy of large food firms such as Monsanto. No other option is available, only artificially pollinated crops; all other food sources will totally collapse. An incredible amount of agricultural crops are nearly, if not completely, dependent on honeybees for pollination. Those 90%-100% dependence on honeybee pollination are apples, avocados, blueberries, cranberries, cherries, kiwi fruit, macadamia nuts, asparagus, broccoli, carrots, cauliflower, celery, cucumbers, onions, legume seeds, pumpkins, squash, and sunflowers. Additional crops that are heavily dependent on honeybees include apricot, citrus (oranges, lemons, limes, grapefruit, tangerines, etc.), peaches, pears, nectarines, plums, grapes, brambleberries, strawberries, olives, melon (cantaloupe, watermelon, and honeydew), peanuts, cotton, soybeans, and sugar beets. You get it: there are a lot of fruits and vegetables that need honeybees. Monetarily, honeybee pollination is estimated to generate $15 billion annually. Some estimates are even higher at $20 billion annually due to honeybees increasing yield and quality achieved from pollination and seed production.
That’s how screwed we are, now onto what the hell happened.
Reading several articles on the subject I’ve found a lot of misrepresentations of the phenomenon of “Colony Collapse Disorder” or CCD. Much of the confusion seems to be generated (purposefully or not) by how CCD is defined and what natural factors should not be considered a CCD event. Parasites, protein deficiency, immune problems, radio waves, and pesticides are some of the leading possibilities. Until some recent research from Harvard (which we’ll get to in a minute) none of these options could be proved to cause true CCD. And we’ll see why. Trying to sort out all these details can be confusing and overwhelming. Many of the causes have been trumpeted in a way that seems more convenient than fact-based. For example, viruses, fungi, and mites can all kill Honey Bees when the bees’ immune systems are deficient. Research that focused on the viruses, fungi, or mites however ignored the causal issue, “Why would honeybees have a deficient immune system in the first place?”
One such study from the University of California Davis posited the idea that radio waves interfered with the bees’ internal navigation system. This theory has two problems. 1) Honeybees use polarized light and landmarks to navigate, not radio waves. 2) Radio waves in the atmosphere are constant, but bee colony collapses happened randomly at varied spots and at different times. And there are still small bee colonies kept healthy and populated. How did radio waves (which are ubiquitous) not reach those particular bees? The answer is that the theory put forth by UC Davis stems from a misrepresentation of a German paper. Unfortunately, the misrepresentation persists to this day.
Another predominant line of thinking holds that parasites such as Nosema ceranae (fungal invader of adult bee intestinal tract) and Israeli Acute Paralysis Virus are causing the collapses. On their surface, these look like excellent causes, a lot of research has shown that these intrusive diseases can indeed be fatal for a bee colony. Until we learn that these diseases have been found in bee samples years before the colony collapses began.
Additionally, mites have been cited as the source of colony collapse. The tracheal mites and varroa mites that can cause colony devastation are not present in high enough numbers –probably due to beekeeper mitigation through miticides. And, just like the parasitic diseases, the mites were also present in colonies for decades before the CCD crisis. Even though they put stress on the hives it is doubtful they have caused CCD as it is defined.
For example, according to the Congressional Investigation Report “Honey Bee Colony Collapse Disorder,” dated January 7, 2010: “[Varroa parasitism] is associated with viral pathogens and if left untreated can cause colony mortalities usually within six months to two years after the initial infestation.” Six months to two years? That is not a sudden collapse! This fact alone should be enough to debunk the mite theory. The report also (quite contradictory to its mite assessment) states, “How CCD Differs from Past Bee Colony Losses: Current bee colony losses seem to differ from past losses in that colony losses are occurring mostly because bees are failing to return to the hive (which is largely uncharacteristic of bee behavior); bee colony losses have been rapid; colony losses are occurring in large numbers.” The fact that CCD colonies seem to be susceptible to several pathogens point to a systemic problem that compromises the immune-system and not any single one of these pathogens.
Hello neonicotinoid insecticides!
The real culprits in the CCD events are two pesticides produced by Takeda Chemical Industries and Bayer AG. These pesticides are used and distributed by Monsanto. One of the pesticides is called Imidacloprid, the other is Clothianidin. The pesticides are “neonicotinoid” in that they’re very similar in structure to nicotine.
Clothianidin acts on the Central Nervous System. In particular, it’s an agonist of acetylcholine. (Agonist refers to propagating or potentiating activity of a neuron.) Basically, Clothianidin increases the firing or effects of that neuro-chemical Acetylcholine. Acetylcholine affects several areas of the brain and could easily affect a bee’s navigation system.
Germany suffered catastrophic colony collapses in 2007 after the use of Clothianidin, and more recently Imidacloprid, to halt a rootworm epidemic. After use of these pesticides, Germany experienced 330 million bee deaths. “According to the German Research Center for Cultivated Plants, 29 out of 30 dead bees had been killed, in the 2008 study, by direct contact with clothianidin.”
And, even small amounts of these pesticides harm bees. In a study appearing in the June issue of the Bulletin of Insectology from Harvard School of Public Health, Dr. Alex Lu, conclusively links Imidacloprid to CCD. Talking about his study in the Harvard Gazette, Dr. Lu states, “[it] apparently doesn’t take much of the pesticide to affect the bees. Our experiment included pesticide amounts below what is normally present in the environment.”
The dangers of these pesticides have also been known for some time by the EPA. From a document obtained through Freedom of Information Act request we find that the EPA started studying neonicotinoids in 2000 and found that they may be harmful to bees as early as 2003. From one such study:
Clothianidin’s major risk concern is to nontarget insects (that is, honey bees). Clothianidin is a neonicotiniod insecticide that is both persistent and systemic. Acute toxicity studies to honey bees show that clothianidin is highly toxic on both a contact and an oral basis. Although EFED does not conduct RQ based assessments on non-target insects, information from standard tests and field studies, as well as incident reports involving other neonicotinoids insecticides (e.g., imidacloprid) suggest the potential for long term toxic risk to honey bees and other beneficial insects.
In another action, the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) had to sue the EPA in order to get data that was being held that linked Monsanto and Bayer to CCD. From the letter:
EPA has failed to respond to NRDC’s Freedom of Information Act request for agency records concerning the toxicity of pesticides to bees, forcing the legal action … [I]n 2003, EPA granted a registration to a new pesticide manufactured by Bayer CropScience under the condition that Bayer submit studies about its product’s impact on bees. EPA has refused to disclose the results of these studies, or if the studies have even been submitted. The pesticide in question, clothianidin, recently was banned in Germany due to concerns about its impact on bees. A similar insecticide was banned in France for the same reason a couple of years before. In the United States, these chemicals still are in use despite a growing consensus among bee specialists that pesticides, including clothianidin and its chemical cousins, may contribute to CCD.
To further hide their tracks, on September 28, 2011 Monsanto bought out some of those bee specialists –specifically the leading research firm Beeologics, a company dedicated to the study and protection of honeybees.
There is another issue with Colony Collapse Disorder that is not readily apparent. Honeybees are the only insect we’ve so far noticed disappearing because of a multi-billion dollar industry surrounding their well-being. What other insect impacts are we causing? Are other pollinating insects, like the butterfly, also going extinct? What about environmental impacts on birds and other animals we depend upon? How about ourselves?
Let’s examine some of our own mysterious diseases. Could they be linked to the same neonicotinoid insecticides? Food allergies have increased in US children by two to five times in the past 30 years. Developmental disorders, including Autism, have increased by a similar percentage in the same timeframe. There’s so far no link to neonicotinoid pesticides and our own allergies and diseases. Seeing as how I’m a neuroscience researcher allow me to leave the reservation for a minute and get “science-y.” Acetylcholine release from peripheral parasympathetic system decreases the release of proinflammatory cytokines. This suggests that a mechanism for a neurotoxin in our food might affect our immune system during fetal development. I don’t know if that hypothesis will pan out, but at the very least, shouldn’t we consider investigating these questions? We should definitely halt the widespread use of these chemicals until bee populations recover and in the meantime we could study how they possibly harm us humans.
Here comes the politics.
Another question you may be asking yourself is how the government, specifically the EPA, knew about the chemically-induced Colony Collapse Disorder and allowed it to continue. Just like the research firm, Beelogics, everyone has their price –no matter if they’re Democrat or Republican. From Opensecrets.org, individual Monsanto contributions to politicians (only as of June of this year):
  • Aaron Schock (R)
  • Adam Kinzinger (R)
  • Adrian Smith (R)
  • Ben Nelson (D)
  • Bennie G. Thompson (D)
  • Billy Long (R)
  • Blaine Luetkemeyer (R)
  • Bob Goodlatte (R)
  • Bobby Schilling (R)
  • Bruce Braley (D)
  • Chuck Grassley (R)
  • Claire McCaskill (D)
  • Colleen Hanabusa (D)
  • Collin C. Peterson (D)
  • Cory Gardner (R)
  • David Loebsack (D)
  • Deborah Ann Stabenow (D)
  • Devin Nunes (R)
  • Emanuel Cleaver (D)
  • Frank D. Lucas (R)
  • Hal Rogers (R)
  • Jack Kingston (R)
  • James E. Risch (R)
  • Joe Courtney (D)
  • John Boozman (R)
  • Larry Kissell (D)
  • Lynn Jenkins (R)
  • Marlin Stutzman (R)
  • Mike Crapo (R)
  • Mike Simpson (R)
  • Pat Roberts (R)
  • Richard G. Lugar (R)
  • Rick Berg (R)
  • Roy Blunt (R)
  • Sam Graves (R)
  • Saxby Chambliss (R)
  • Steve Fincher (R)
  • Tim Huelskamp (R)
  • Timothy Johnson (R)
  • Todd Akin (R)
  • Todd Rokita (R)
  • Tom Harkin (D)
  • Tom Latham (R)
  • Vicky Hartzler (R)
  • William L. Clay Jr. (D)
How about our President of “change?” He’s appointed several Monsanto people to his administration. Let’s look at a lineup of who Obama promoted from Monsanto lackey to government overseer. As reported by Organic Consumer’s Association:
  • Tom Vilsack, USDA Secretary: As Iowa Governor, Tom Vilsack was a leading advocate for Monsanto, genetic engineering, and factory farming.
  • Michael Taylor, Senior Adviser to the Food and Drug Administration Commissioner on Food Safety: The Vice President for Public Policy at Monsanto Corp. from 1998 until 2001, Taylor exemplifies the revolving door between the food industry and the government agencies that regulate it.
  • Roger Beachy, Director of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture: Beachy is a long time Monsanto collaborator who heads an institute which is effectively a Monsanto front.
  • Islam Siddiqui, Chief Agricultural Negotiator for the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative: Islam Siddiqui…was Vice President of CropLife America, the notorious lobbying group that represents pesticide and genetic engineering companies, including the six multinational corporations that control 75% of the global agrichemical market: Monsanto, Syngenta, Bayer, BASF, Dow and DuPont.
  • Elena Kagan, Supreme Court Justice: As President Obama’s Solicitor General, Kagan argued Monsanto’s side against organic farmers in the Roundup Ready alfalfa case … Kagan joined a Supreme Court that includes a former Monsanto lawyer, Clarence Thomas.
The conclusion: What can we do?
Nothing, you’re fucked. Monsanto owns the government, makes a profit now from honeybee-killing practices, and stand to make a huge payoff from honeybee extinction. Nothing will change that and it means total economic and food-supply devastation. After that, you need to learn to grow your own food and tend your own bees or at least know people who can.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-honeybee-deaths-linked-seed-insecticide.html


Honeybee deaths linked to seed insecticide exposure


Honeybee populations have been in serious decline for years, and Purdue University scientists may have identified one of the factors that cause bee deaths around agricultural fields.
Analyses of  found dead in and around hives from several apiaries over two years in Indiana showed the presence of neonicotinoid insecticides, which are commonly used to coat corn and soybean seeds before planting. The research showed that those insecticides were present at high concentrations in waste talc that is exhausted from farm machinery during planting.
The insecticides clothianidin and thiamethoxam were also consistently found at low levels in soil - up to two years after treated seed was planted - on nearby dandelion flowers and in corn pollen gathered by the bees, according to the findings released in the journal  this month.
"We know that these insecticides are highly toxic to bees; we found them in each sample of dead and dying bees," said Christian Krupke, associate professor of entomology and a co-author of the findings.
The United States is losing about one-third of its  hives each year, according to Greg Hunt, a Purdue professor of , honeybee specialist and co-author of the findings. Hunt said no one factor is to blame, though scientists believe that others such as mites and insecticides are all working against the bees, which are important for pollinating  and .
"It's like death by a thousand cuts for these bees," Hunt said.
Krupke and Hunt received reports that bee deaths in 2010 and 2011 were occurring at planting time in hives near . Toxicological screenings performed by Brian Eitzer, a co-author of the study from the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, for an array of pesticides showed that the neonicotinoids used to treat corn and soybean seed were present in each sample of affected bees. Krupke said other bees at those hives exhibited tremors, uncoordinated movement and convulsions, all signs of insecticide poisoning.

Seeds of most annual crops are coated in neonicotinoid insecticides for protection after planting. All corn seed and about half of all soybean seed is treated. The coatings are sticky, and in order to keep seeds flowing freely in the vacuum systems used in planters, they are mixed with talc. Excess talc used in the process is released during planting and routine planter cleaning procedures.
"Given the rates of corn planting and talc usage, we are blowing large amounts of contaminated talc into the environment. The dust is quite light and appears to be quite mobile," Krupke said.
Krupke said the corn pollen that bees were bringing back to hives later in the year tested positive for neonicotinoids at levels roughly below 100 parts per billion.
"That's enough to kill bees if sufficient amounts are consumed, but it is not acutely toxic," he said.
On the other hand, the exhausted talc showed extremely high levels of the insecticides - up to about 700,000 times the lethal contact dose for a bee.
"Whatever was on the seed was being exhausted into the environment," Krupke said. "This material is so concentrated that even small amounts landing on flowering plants around a field can kill foragers or be transported to the hive in contaminated pollen. This might be why we found these insecticides in pollen that the bees had collected and brought back to their hives."
Krupke suggested that efforts could be made to limit or eliminate talc emissions during planting.
"That's the first target for corrective action," he said. "It stands out as being an enormous source of potential environmental contamination, not just for honeybees, but for any insects living in or near these fields. The fact that these compounds can persist for months or years means that plants growing in these soils can take up these compounds in leaf tissue or pollen."
Although corn and soybean production does not require insect pollinators, that is not the case for most plants that provide food. Krupke said protecting bees benefits agriculture since most fruit, nut and vegetable crop plants depend upon honeybees for pollination. The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates the value of honeybees to commercial agriculture at $15 billion to $20 billion annually.
Hunt said he would continue to study the sublethal effects of neonicotinoids. He said for bees that do not die from the insecticide there could be other effects, such as loss of homing ability or less resistance to disease or mites.
"I think we need to stop and try to understand the risks associated with these insecticides," Hunt said.
ABSTRACT
Christian H. Krupke, Greg J. Hunt, Brian D. Eitzer, Gladys Andino, Krispn Given
Populations of honeybees and other pollinators have declined worldwide in recent years. A variety of stressors have been implicated as potential causes, including agricultural pesticides. Neonicotinoid , which are widely used and highly toxic to honeybees, have been found in previous analyses of honeybee pollen and comb material. However, the routes of exposure have remained largely undefined. We used LC/MS-MS to analyze samples of honeybees, pollen stored in the hive and several potential exposure routes associated with plantings of neonicotinoid treated maize. Our results demonstrate that bees are exposed to these compounds and several other agricultural pesticides in several ways throughout the foraging period. During spring, extremely high levels of clothianidin and thiamethoxam were found in planter exhaust material produced during the planting of treated maize seed. We also found neonicotinoids in the soil of each field we sampled, including unplanted fields. Plants visited by foraging bees (dandelions) growing near these fields were found to contain neonicotinoids as well. This indicates deposition of neonicotinoids on the flowers, uptake by the root system, or both. Dead bees collected near hive entrances during the spring sampling period were found to contain clothianidin as well, although whether exposure was oral (consuming pollen) or by contact (soil/planter dust) is unclear. We also detected the insecticide clothianidin in pollen collected by bees and stored in the hive. When maize plants in our field reached anthesis, maize pollen from treated seed was found to contain clothianidin and other pesticides; and honeybees in our study readily collected maize pollen. These findings clarify some of the mechanisms by which honeybees may be exposed to agricultural pesticides throughout the growing season. These results have implications for a wide range of large-scale annual cropping systems that utilize neonicotinoid seed treatments.
Provided by Purdue University 

Thursday, February 02, 2012

http://video.pbs.org/video/995224587

Help Save The Bees

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episodes/silence-of-the-bees/video-full-episode/251/#.TyqPjUzybKc.google


Monday, March 15, 2010

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

LONDON, England (CNN) -- A British consortium pledged Tuesday to spend up to £10 million ($14.5 million) in research grants to find out what is causing a serious decline in bees and other pollinating insects.

Bee populations have recently seen sharp declines across the United States, Canada, and Europe.

Bee populations have recently seen sharp declines across the United States, Canada, and Europe.

Those insects -- including honey bees, bumble bees, butterflies and moths -- play an essential role in pollinating many vital crops, but their numbers have been declining steadily in recent years, scientists say.

In the United Kingdom alone, the number of pollinators has fallen between 10 and 15 percent in the past two years, according to the Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council (BBSRC), a government-sponsored research group.

"This funding will give some of Britain's world-class researchers the chance to identify the causes of the decline we're seeing in bee numbers, and that will help us to take the right action to help," British Environment Secretary Hilary Benn said in a statement.

The Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs and the BBSRC are each committing more than £2 million ($2.9 million) to the initiative. Also pledging funding are the Natural Environment Research Council, partly funded by the British government; the Wellcome Trust, a medical research charity; and the Scottish government.

Together, the group plans to put out a call for researchers to apply for the funding, and will decide which researchers will get the money, up to £10 million, said Matt Goode, a spokesman for the BBSRC.

"What we're hoping for is that across the £10 million, we will fund scientists who will be able to look at the entire system -- environmental factors, social factors, agricultural factors -- to address this problem as a whole," Goode told CNN. "We want to build a new community of pollinator scientists that can keep on top of this for the future as well."

Bee populations have recently seen sharp declines across the United States, Canada, and Europe, but the reasons are not fully understood, the British Beekeepers' Association has said.

New diseases and pests could be part of the problem, as could habitat loss, the inappropriate use of chemicals in farming, and poor weather conditions, the association said in a January report on the problems.

The declines could have a serious effect on food security because bees are essential to pollination. In the early spring, honey bees are the only pollinators present in substantial numbers, so they are particularly important for early flowering crops like fruit, the association says.

As an example, bees are 90-percent responsible for pollinating apple crops, the beekeepers' association says.

"It is generally held that one in three mouthfuls of the food that we eat is bee-pollinated, and bees likewise play an immeasurable part in providing food for our wildlife," the report said. "Colony losses thus have a significant impact on food production and sustainability."

Without effective pollination, the planet faces higher food costs and potential shortages, BBSRC Chief Executive Douglas Kell said. The funding can help scientists understand why bee populations are declining and how the decline can be stopped, he said.

The decline of bees is especially acute in the United Kingdom, because the the vast majority of honey bee colonies are managed by amateur beekeepers who operate for pleasure rather than profit, the beekeepers' association says.

In the United States and other countries, there are substantial commercial beekeeping sectors with enough financial backing to regenerate lost honey bee colonies, the association says. But in Britain, amateurs who have four or five colonies cannot recover in the face of substantial losses and may have to give up their hobby.

Such losses naturally have an impact on the availability of honey, the honey bee's primary product. The United Kingdom already imports more than 80 percent of its honey, the association says, so world shortages would make it even harder to find -- and more expensive to buy -- in Britain.

"The devastating effect that this decline may have on our environment would almost certainly have a serious impact on our health and well-being," said Mark Walport, director of the Wellcome Trust. "Without pollinating insects, many important crops and native plants would be severely harmed."

Alarm bells were raised in 2007 when scientists noted a phenomenon in America called "Colony Collapse Disorder" (CCD), the beekeepers' association said. The phenomenon sees worker bees suddenly leaving the hives and never returning, and it has affected billions of bees across the United States.

"If a bee leaves the hive and can't find its way back then it's dead. If a lot of bees do that, then the colony is dead," explained Chris Deaves of Twickenham Apiary in southwest London.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture awarded $4.1 million last year to scientists across the country to find out what is causing the decline.

"One of the suspected causes of CCD is the intense ways that we manage bees in the 21st century," said Keith Delaplane, a professor at the University of Georgia who is taking part in the study. "Beehives are moved, put on pallets, loaded on trucks, moved overnight 500 miles and set down some other place. They are constantly in stimulating foraging mode."

The use of chemicals to control bee parasites may also be contributing to the problem, he told CNN.

Tuesday, March 03, 2009

Friday, November 21, 2008

Colony Collapse Disorder and cow Urine?

Trying to imagine a world without bees is not an easy task. Sure you wouldn’t have them buzzing around every time you ate lunch outside and your kids would be safe from painful stings during summer adventures but would we really notice if they went missing?

Would it really affect your life if tomorrow you woke up, turned on the news and realized that all the bees had just disappeared?

The answer is yes. Your life would be drastically affected if they were to disappear.

Considering that bees are responsible for about 30% of the food supply in the U.S. alone, I’d say that we depend on them more than one might realize.

The honeybee population has dropped by half over the last 50 years. While many are baffled by the incredible decrease, others contribute it mainly to mites and pesticides.

Not only would we lose fruits and vegetables that the honeybee pollinates but the Leafcutter bee and Alkali bee, which pollinate alfalfa, are also in danger. This poses a major threat to the meat supply.
A New Hope For The Bee Population?

There have been recent reports out of India about the use of cow urine to control microbial diseases in bee larva. Yes, you read that correctly. Researchers have been spraying the eggs with cow urine, which not only controls microbial disease during the rearing processes but also makes the colony work more efficiently by removing the unhealthy larva. The cow urine seems to be an efficient, safe alternative to the medicines that are currently used to treat microbial disease.

While this sounds a little unconventional for many, it could be a major step in helping increase the honeybee population.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

GREENHOUSE BUMBLEBEE PARASITES

The researchers then sampled wild bumblebee populations around the greenhouses, catching bees in butterfly nets, holding them in vials and taking them back to a laboratory to screen for pathogens, including testing their feces.

The patterns that had been predicted by their mathematical model were borne out by studying the wild bees, they said.

Most of the parasites in the wild bumblebees were found to be at normal levels except for one intestinal parasite known as Crithidia bombi that is common in commercial bee colonies but typically absent in wild bumblebees.

The researchers found that up to half of wild bumblebees near the greenhouses were infected with this parasite.

"All of the different species of bumblebees that we sampled around greenhouses showed the same pattern: really high levels of infection near greenhouses and then declining levels of infection as you moved out," said Michael Otterstatter of the University of Toronto, one of the researchers.

"It was quite obvious that this was coming from the greenhouses and it was a general adverse effect on the bumblebees," Otterstatter added in a telephone interview.

He said the parasite weakens and often kills bees. The "spillover" of disease from commercial colonies may be a factor in the decline of bee populations in North America, he added.

The study, published in the Public Library of Science journal PLoS ONE, can be read here

(Editing by Maggie Fox and Sandra Maler